The community rules here supersede how the internet operates. For example, if the author put up a message with profanity towards HN and the moderators here I'm sure HN would remove the link. So why doesn't it do it for something more polite?
> The community rules here supersede how the internet operates. For example, if the author put up a message with profanity towards HN and the moderators here I'm sure HN would remove the link.
Because the moderators here will remove you or rate limit your account for disparaging them. They have very thin skins. So why wouldn't the same apply to criticism coming from elsewhere?
What I'm observing is you are asseting a lot of priors about how HN's moderation is, and then exhibiting confusion when reality does not match what the priors would predict.
Perhaps this indicates your priors are incorrect? Considering this post remains up.
It's not an attack, it's a description of your behavior. Alongside your stated opinion, you keep asking questions wondering why reality isn't different than the way it is.
> shouldn't HN remove the link?
> So why doesn't it do it for something more polite?
> So why wouldn't the same apply to criticism coming from elsewhere?
And yet the submission stays up. I'm sorry you felt attacked by the word "confused" being used to describe your behavior when you are asking questions about how you do not understand why things are the way they are. I'm open to using other terms if you prefer.
While we're discussing terms for behavior, often when someone assists another person who is wondering at how they do not understand why reality is as it is, that is referred to as "helpful".
I'm sorry to have upset you so badly. This might not be the site for you if you react so poorly to someone pointing out the things you say are not self-consistent. Considering your opinions of the site's staff, this will be no great loss for you.
I'm not up to the task of remembering your username. Since you care, feel free to remember mine and not reply to future comments.