It connected the two incidents per license plate readings per the article. Why do you think it wasn’t?

My question is how many other license plates also would have been connected this way? What's the false positive rate?

Why is that relevant for this case?

If there's any claim that "flock found these two plates were seen in both areas!!111" then how many other plates were seen in both areas in the same timeframe? How much of this is throwing away results that disagree with the narrative?

He may have only committed suicide once he knew they were closing in.